ababb2c3d12ea5fe3d9b90a0cb5ca0aaef920739
Verified against the DUT. Two things were wrong in the SWB confs.
Channel assignment: CONN13/CONN15 and CONN14/CONN16 were paired the
wrong way round. The bench wiring is
SWB0 Ch6 = CONN14/CONN16 Ch8 = CONN13/CONN15
SWB1 Ch7 = CONN14/CONN16 Ch9 = CONN13/CONN15
LTC2977 addresses: the high half of each LTC2980 was recorded one step
above the low half (0x5C/0x5D, 0x62/0x63). These are 7-bit addresses
derived from 8-bit pairs, so they step by two: 0x5C/0x5E and 0x62/0x64.
This also clears the collision noted in v2.6.0, where SWB0_CONN13 chip2
and SWB0_CONN14 chip1 both landed on 0x5E on Ch6. Each channel now
carries two disjoint address pairs (0x5C/0x5E and 0x62/0x64), verified
collision-free across all eight SWB confs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014RetWKFZFG1ZHcitQAyhwM
Description
Blanton Tera Term TTL reliability test
4.2 MiB